PECULIARITIES OF THE CHRONOTOPE THROUGH THE PRISM OF IDENTITY PROBLEM OF THE URBAN NOVEL CHARACTER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1319Ключові слова:
chronotope, Orhan Pamuk, topos of the city, topos of the house, identity, existencesАнотація
The article analyses the chronotope of the novel by Orhan Pamuk Silent House through the prism of identity problem. The purpose of the article is to establish a connection of this problem to the peculiarities of the interpretation of the chronotope (which is a result of analysis of the opposites capital-country and East-West. The urban issue of the Silent House grounds on the eschatological paradigm and the cyclic concept of the world, the concept of eternal return; this attests a postmodernist understanding of the categories of time and space. Hence, the composition of the novel is a peculiar spatial and temporal mosaic and narrative polyphony. In the temporal space of the Silent House the spatial (home and provincial town) and temporal (past and present) images, motive of travel (real and metaphysical in the form of memories), of the travelers acquire the semantics of existential metamorphosis that lead to moral and spiritual initiation. And the closed space of the novel — the house of Mrs. Fatma and the provincial Turkish town — appears as a special topos-gerontope, the main principle of which is a freezing of the time. In this way Pamuk realizes typical for his works problems of relations between the West and the East and self-identification.
Завантаження
Посилання
Akunin, B. (2016). Pravylne misto maie buty dobrozychlyvym do chuzhykh i spovnenym prykhovanykh smysliv dlia svoikh. Vsesvit, No. 7–8, pp.194–197 (in Ukranian).
Hundorova, T. (2013). Pisliachornobylska biblioteka: Ukrainskyi literaturnyi postmodernizm. Kyiv: Krytyka, 344 p. (in Ukranian).
Izer, V. (2001). Akty vymysla, ili Chto fiktivno v fiktsionalnom tekste. Nemetskoe filosofskoie literaturovedenie nashikh dnei. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo SPbGU, pp. 186–216 (in Russian).
Kyskin, O. (2006). Urbanistychnyi khronotop v postmodernistskomu romani («Chapaiev i pustota» V. Pelevina, «Perverziia» Yu. Andrukhovycha, «Bezsmertia» M. Kundery). Dys. kand. filol. nauk za spec. 10.01.06 «teoriia literatury». Izmail, 184 p. (in Ukranian).
Lapenkov, V. Imperiia, metafizika, marginalnost: vzgliad iz Sankt-Peterburga (in Russian).
http://www.netslova.ru/lapenkov/imperia.html
Lotman, Yu. (1988). V shkole poeticheskogo slova: Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol. Moskva: Nauka, 352 p. (in Russian).
Nikolskii, E. (2016). Semeinyie istorii v rannem tvorchestve Orhana Pamuka: ideologiia i poetika. Studia humanitatis, No. 2, P. 51–54 (in Russian).
Pamuk, O. (2015). Movchaznyi dim. Kharkiv: Folio, 441 p. (in Ukranian).
Porokhniak, N. (2010). Roman-simeina khronika z pohliadu literaturoznavchoi antropolohii. Pytannia literaturoznavstva, Chernivtsi, Issue 79, P. 145–154 (in Ukranian).
Prokofieva, V. (2005). Kategoriia «prostranstvo» v khudozhestvennom prelomlenii: lokusy i toposy. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 11, pp. 87–92 (in Russian).
Toporov, V. (1983). Prostranstvo i tekst. Tekst: semantika i struktura. Moskva: Nauka, pp. 227–284 (in Russian).
Khainadi, Z. (2004). Arkhitipicheskii topos. Literatura, No. 29, pp. 7–11 (in Russian).
Tsivian, T. (1978). Dom v folklornoi modeli mira (na materiale balkanskikh zagadok). Semiotika kultury. Trudy po znakovym sistemam, Tartu, pp. 65–75 (in Russian).
Опубліковано
Як цитувати
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2019 Літературний процес: методологія, імена, тенденції
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
