THE MATTER OF DISABILITY IN THE LIGHT OF ENLIGHTENMENT IDEAS IN EUROPE OF 17–18 CENTURIES

Автор(и)

  • Nazar Malaniy PhD in Philology PhD student of the Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohienko National University Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1320

Ключові слова:

disability, Other body, non-normative corporality, Enlightenment, atheism, deism

Анотація

The article reveals the leading constructs of non-normative corporeality in the context of a diachronic cut of disability studies. The dominant core is the systematization of the achievements of the Enlightenment about the problems of people with visual, hearing and speech impairments. The author analyzes the works of prominent thinkers Rene Descartes, Denis Diderot and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Scientists have proved the possibility of successful training of people with different body. In the framework of the study the features of dependence of the sick minority from the healthy majority were outlined. Particular emphasis is placed on the theoretical, methodological and philosophical projections of disability. The possibility of applying innovative visions of the epoch for further study of this ambivalent phenomenon is noted.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1320

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Посилання

Bandrovska, O. (2014). Modernizm mizh mynulym i maibutnim: antropolohichnyi dyskurs anhliiskoho romanu Lviv. nats. un-t im. I. Franka. Lviv, 442 p. (in Ukrainian).

Hundorova, T. (2010). Symptomatyka «khvoroho tila». Krytyka, Chyslo 7–8 (No. 153–154), K., pp. 24–26 (in Ukrainian).

Dekart, R. (1953). Rassuzhdenie o metode s pril.: «Dioptrika», «Meteory», «Geometriia». Moskva: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 656 p. (in Russian).

Dekart, R. (1989). Sochineniia v 2 t.: per. s lat. i frants. T. 1, M.: Mysl, 654 p. (in Russian).

Didro, D. (1986). Sochineniia: v 2-kh t. T. 1, M.: Mysl, 592 p. (in Russian).

Malofeiev, N. (2003). Zapadnaia Yevropa: evoliutsiia otnosheniia obshchestva i gosudarstva k litsam s otkloneniiami v razvitii. M.: Izdatelstvo «Ekzamen», 256 p. (in Russian).

Sverbilova, T. (2015). Motyv podorozhi v suchasnomu synema-teksti v svitli sotsialnoi modeli dyzabilyti (nenormatyvnoi tilesnosti). Suchasni literaturoznavchi studii, Issue. 12, pp. 488–505 (in Ukrainian).

Sukovata, V. (2012). Teoriia “dyzabiliti” ta konstruktsii invalidnosti v masovii kulturi. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh, No. 1, pp. 84–98 (in Ukrainian).

Uzlova, O. M. (2015). Khvoroba yak «naratyvnyi protez» (na materiali romaniv Devida Lodzha «Terapiia» i «Hlukhota yak vyrok»). Tilo yak vystava: mystetski proektsii: [zbirnyk naukovykh statej]. Berdiansk: FOP Tkachuk O. V.,. pp. 18–24 (in Ukrainian).

Russo, Zh.-Zh. (1961). Izbrannyie sochineniia v trekh tomakh. Tom 3. Perevod s frantsuzskogo D. A. Gorbova. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoie izdatelstvo khudozhestvennoi literatury, 727 p. (in Russian).

Diderot, D. (1961). Early Philosophical Works. Translated and edited by Margaret Jourdain. Chacago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company, 246 p.

Downloads


Переглядів анотації: 222

Опубліковано

30.06.2019

Як цитувати

Malaniy, N. (2019). THE MATTER OF DISABILITY IN THE LIGHT OF ENLIGHTENMENT IDEAS IN EUROPE OF 17–18 CENTURIES. Літературний процес: методологія, імена, тенденції, (13). https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1320

Номер

Розділ

Поетологічний дискурс