THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL UNIVERSALITY OF MEMORY AND OBLIVION CATEGORIES IN LITERATURE

Автор(и)

  • Valerii Bren PhD student of the Department of Ukrainian Literature and Comparative Studies Institute of Philology of the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1311

Ключові слова:

memory, oblivion, identity, trauma, discourse, common place

Анотація

This research is devoted to the concepts of memory and oblivion in terms of the universality of these categories for literature, and their interdisciplinary in history, culturology, and sociology. The theoretical basis for analysis in the artistic text is shown on the example of Ukrainian and foreign researchers, specified and illustrated manifestations in the Ukrainian novels by Y. Andrukhovych, O. Zabuzhko, S. Zhadan, O. Irvanetz, etc. Literature is the centre of individual and national cultural memory and a means of creating of it. However, it becomes a platform for social discourse of memory, as well as the preservation of individual memory as a genetic key in the text. Consequently, modern literary studies require a well-balanced approach and analysis of the ways, means, methods, and forms of its functioning in contemporary art. Such approach will enable an understanding of the past experience, as well as assessments of contemporary imprints of events in the future, on a qualitatively new level.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1311

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Посилання

Biliatska, V. (2016). Osmyslennia problem natsionalnoi pamiati, identychnosti narodu v romanakh u virshakh Nila Hilevycha ta Vasylia Marsiuka. Literaturnyi protses: metodolohiia, imena, tendentsii. Filolohichni nauky, (8), pp. 45–51 (in Ukrainian).

http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Litpro_2016_8_11

Hnatiuk, O. (2005). Proshchannia z imperiieiu: Ukrainski dyskusii pro identychnist. K.: Krytyka, 528 p. (in Ukrainian).

Kyrydon, A. (2016). Heterotopii pamiati: teoretyko-metodolohichni problemy studii pamiati. K.: Nika-Tsentr, 320 p. (in Ukrainian).

Kyrydon, A. (2014). Studii pamiati v Ukraini: osnovni tendentsii stanovlennia. Ukraina-Yevropa-Svit, Mizhnarodnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats, Seriia: Istoriia, mizhnarodni vidnosyny, (14), 265–273 (in Ukrainian).

Lavrynovych, L. B. (2010). Koordynaty pamiati u khudozhniomu prostori postmodernoi literatury. Naukovi pratsi [Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly kompleksu Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia], Seriia: Filolohiia. Literaturoznavstvo, 135, Issue 122, 55–60 (in Ukrainian). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Npchdufl_2010_135_122_14

Lanovyk, M. (2011). Natsionalna pamiat yak formanta literaturnoho prostoru. Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho nats. ped. un-tu im. V. Hnatiuka, 32, 175–179 (in Ukrainian).

Pukhonska, O. (2017). Kulturna amneziia: vid suspilnoho do literaturnoho dyskursu nezalezhnosti. Synopsys: tekst, kontekst, media, 1 Issue 17 (inj Ukrainian).

http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/stkm_2017_1_3

Pukhonska, O. (2016). Travmatychna pamiat i natsionalna identychnist: posttotalitarna versiia vzaiemovplyvu (na prykladi suchasnoi ukrainskoi literatury). Literaturnyi protses: metodolohiia, imena, tendentsii. Filolohichni nauky, Issue 7, 107–111 (in Ukrainian). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Litpro_2016_7_22

Erll, A. & Rigney, A. (2006). Literature and the Production of Cultural memory: Introduction. European Journal of English Studies, 10 (2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570600753394

Erll, A. (2011). Traumatic Pasts, Literary Afterlives, and Transcultural memory: New Directions of Literary and Media Memory Studies. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 3 (1), 71–86.

https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v3i0.7186

Lachmann, R. (2004). Cultural Memory and the Role of Literature. Cambridge University Press, European Review, 12 (2), 165–178.

Skopljanac, L. (2012). Literature Through Recall:

Downloads


Переглядів анотації: 169

Опубліковано

30.06.2019

Як цитувати

Bren, V. (2019). THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL UNIVERSALITY OF MEMORY AND OBLIVION CATEGORIES IN LITERATURE. Літературний процес: методологія, імена, тенденції, (13). https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.1311