Theoretical Aspects of Trauma Studies (terminology, problematic issues and scheme of analysis): An attempt at analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2024.24.9Keywords:
trauma studies, trauma, literary theoryAbstract
The article focuses on the theoretical aspects of trauma studies and attempts to discuss the gaps and problematic areas within the methodology. Contemporary trauma studies, despite its rather active development over the past decades, has the problem of clear articulation of its key definitions and methodology. Moreover, the very subject of the studies — trauma — has a naming problem: when the term is transferred from the field of psychiatry, clarity is lost, instead, the emphasis is placed on the impossibility of a full understanding of the phenomenon. Therefore, the purpose of the article is, first of all, an attempt to develop a terminological apparatus and a method of analysing traumatic narratives. This paper will focus on reflections on the key term trauma, as well as an attempt to develop a terminological apparatus and a method of text analysis within these studies.
The subject of the article is an attempt to formulate fundamental terms and propose a method for analysing trauma in a literary text. Drawing primarily on cognitive behavioural therapy, the method is an experiment in looking at trauma from the perspective of cognitive behavioural therapy, psychology, neuroscience and philosophy.
This article outlines the subject of trauma studies (traumatic event, trauma, consequences of trauma) and notes the problematic aspects of trauma studies: the blurring of some of its terms and warnings about the tendentious use of its conceptual apparatus. The main terms of trauma studies were named as follows: trauma was defined as the experience of an event that excessively upsets and at least temporarily suppresses the internal resources of an individual, as well as causes persistent psychological symptoms; the traumatic event was called the event itself, which leads to trauma; the consequences of trauma — all possible reactions to a traumatic event after its actual experience — included the following stress — a set of protective physiological reactions that occur in the body of animals and humans in response to the impact of various adverse factors (stressors); fear as an emotional reaction to a real or imaginary threat; and defence mechanisms — automatic unconscious mechanisms connected with the self that provide mental protection of the individual.
Finally, a five-part descriptive method of trauma analysis was proposed, which includes: identifying the cause of the trauma, the way the narrative is articulated, describing the fears produced by the trauma, characterising stress and reactions to it and defence mechanisms, and finally, seeing whether the trauma is integrated within the text itself. This method was tested on the material of Pavlo Vyshebaba’s short story ‘The Martians’ as an example of a text where trauma is successfully integrated into the experience of the characters. The proposed method can be further expanded and applied to other texts as a potential template for analysing trauma narratives.
Downloads
References
American Psychiatric Association, & DSM-5 Task Force. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
American Psychiatric Association. (2024). Dovidnyk diahnostychnykh kryteriiv DSM-5 vid Amerykanskoi psykhiatrychnoi asotsiatsii [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]. Lviv: Manuskrypt [in Ukrainian].
Bolak, J. (2023). Pamiat / Zabuttia [Memory / Forgetting]. Yevropeiskyi slovnyk filosofii: Leksykon neperekladnostei, Vol. 1, Kyiv: Dukh i litera [in Ukrainian].
Briere, J. N., & Scott, C. (2023). Osnovy travmofokusovanoi psykhoterapii [Principles of Trauma Therapy]. Lviv: Manuskrypt [in Ukrainian].
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1353/book.20656
Caruth, C. (Ed.). (1995). Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press [in English].
https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421413525
Grabowicz, G. (2003). Do istorii ukrainskoi literatury. Doslidzhennia, esei, polemika [On the History of Ukrainian Literature. Studies, essays, polemics]. Kyiv: Krytyka [in English].
Hornostai, P. (2018). Kolektyvna travma yak problema sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii [Collective Trauma as a Problem of Social and Political Psychology]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii, 21(1), 54–68 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol21-Year2018-5
Hornostai, P. (2019). Hrupovi zakhysni mekhanizmy yak forma reahuvannia na kolektyvni travmy [Group Defense Mechanisms as a Form of Response to Collective Trauma]. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii, 22(1), 89–114 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol22-Year2019-27
Østby, H., Østby, Y. (2020). Uhlyb za morskym konykom. Knyzhka pro pamiat, shcho zapamiataietsia [Diving for Seahorses. The Science and Secrets of Memory]. Kyiv: Pabulum [in Ukrainian].
Romanchuk, O. (2016). Simia, shcho ztsiliuie. Osnovy terapevtychnoho batkivstva ditei, shcho zaznaly skryvdzhennia ta emotsiinoho zanedbannia [The Healing Family. Fundamentals of therapeutic parenting of children who have been abused and emotionally neglected]. Lviv: Svichado [in Ukrainian].
Romanenko, O. (2021). Fenomen travmatychnoho pysma (Oleksandr Tereshchenko “Zhyttia pislia 16:30”) [The Phenomenon of Traumatic Writing (Oleksandr Tereshchenko’s Life After 4:30)]. Synopsys: tekst, kontekst, media, 27(2), 42–50 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2021.2.1
Rutar, K. (2018). Travmovana chy mifolohizovana pamiat? (na materiali romanu “Tanho smerti” Yuriia Vynnychuka) [Traumatized or mythologized memory (on the material of the novel “The tango oh death” by Yuri Vynnychuk)]. Suchasni problemy movoznavstva i literaturoznavstva, 23(1), 294–298 [in Ukrainian].
https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/22614
Sapolsky, R. (2020). Chomu zebry ne strazhdaiut na vyrazku. [Why Zebras do not Suffer from Ulcers]. Kharkiv: Fabula [in Ukrainian].
Shapar, V. (2007). Suchasnyi tlumachnyi psykholohichnyi slovnyk [Modern Explanatory Psychological Dictionary]. Kharkiv: Prapor [in Ukrainian].
Stanchyshyn, V. (2021). Stiny v moii holovi. Zhyty z tryvozhnistiu ta depresiieiu [The Walls in my Head. Living with anxiety and depression]. Kyiv: Vikhola [in Ukrainian].
Stanchyshyn, V. (2023). Emotsiini hoidalky viiny. Rozdumy psykhoterapevta pro viinu [Emotional Swings of War. Reflections of a psychotherapist on the war]. Kyiv: Vikhola [in Ukrainian].
Tomos, A. (n.d.) Critiquing Classical Trauma Theory Paradigms. Academia.edu [in English]. https://www.academia.edu/36145446/Critical_Review_Critiquing_Classical_Trauma_Theory_ Paradigms
Vyshebaba, P. (2023). Tilky ne pyshy meni pro viinu [Just don’t Write Me about the War]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Odniiei Knyhy [in Ukrainian].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivan Prokopenko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.