“Flow effect” as an important factor of artistic energetization of Shevchenko's poetic text (based on the analysis of the poem “Fate”)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2024.23.4

Keywords:

flow effect, rhythmic melody, poetics, state of flow, intonation contour

Abstract

The article studies the artistic function of such a feature of the poet‘s rhythmic melody as the “flow effect” in  the  context of  the  analysis of  Taras Shevchenko’s poem “Dolya” (“Fate”). The  doctrine of famous American psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, set forth in his book “Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience”, helps to understand the effect of flow as a factor of artistic energising. With reference to the creative experience of artists (composers, musicians, writers), the psychologist proves that they, being in a state of flow, that is, in a state of inspiration, create aesthetically valuable works. The ability for poetic improvisation, which often took on an explosive intensity, is one of the defining features of  Shevchenko’s genius artistic talent. Poetic improvisation is  a  state of  inspiration, a  state of being in a creative flow, when the author expresses himself by creating an artistically sophisticated thing. The poet’s “Shchodennyk” (“Diary”) (the records of 7, 8, 9, February) testifies that the impetus for the creation of the triptych “Dolya” (“Fate”), “Muza” (“Muse”), “Slava” (“Fame”) was the emotional upheaval caused by the breakup with actress Kateryna Piunova, with whom he intended to start a family. Creating a triptych in the mode of improvisation was the way of self-expression, emotional “outpour”, meaning self-soothing. That is why the whole triptych has the mode of lyrical self-comprehension and most prominentlyit manifested itself in the first poem of the triptych “Dolya”.
The analysis of the poem “Dolya” reveals a direct cаorrelation between flowing rhythmic melody and the  means of  expression called “stream of  consciousness”. One of  the  important features of  flowing rhythmic melody in the poem “Dolya” is related to its intonation contour, which is sensitive to the event developments. The key feature of the “flow effect” of the analysed poem is that all expressive components of  the  text (rhythmic, linguistic, compositional...) are realised in  compliance with the  principle of optimality. The flowing state of inspiration, the state of aesthetic exaltation experienced by the poet, due to the distinct flowing rhythmic melody is endowed with a uniquepower to influence the reader — to bring them into the same state of flow, giving them the aesthetic feeling experienced by the author. This is how the author-reader correlation is set into motion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barabash, Y. (2008). Samotnist [Solitude]. In Temy i motyvy poezii Tarasa Shevchenka (pp. 233–255). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Dziuba, I. (2008). Slava [Glory]. In Temy i motyvy poezii Tarasa Shevchenka (pp. 86–95). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Ivakin, Y. (1968). Komentar do “Kobzaria” Shevchenka. Poezii 1847–1861 rr. [Commentary on Shevchenko’s Kobzar. Poetry 1847–1861]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Ivakin, Y. (1986). Notatky shevchenkoznavtsia [Notes of the Shevchenko expert]. Kyiv: Rad. pysmennyk [in Ukrainian].

Klochek, H. (2014). “Potik svidomosti” yak dzherelo khudozhnoi enerhetychnosti liryky Tarasa Shevchenka (na materiali analizu poezii “Khiba samomu napysat…”) [“Stream of consciousness” as a source of artistic energy of Taras Shevchenko’s lyrics (on the material of the analysis of the poetry “Should I write it myself…”)]. Filolohichni dialohy, 4, 72–88 [in Ukrainian].

Klochek, H. (2020). Synerhiia literaturnoho tvoru. Navchalnyi posibnyk z teorii literaturnoho tvoru [Synergy of a literary work. Study guide on the theory of a literary work]. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].

Klochek, H. (1989). U svitli vichnykh kryteriiv (Pro systemu kryteriiv otsinky literaturnoho tvoru) [In the light of eternal criteria (About the system of criteria for evaluating a literary work)]. Kyiv: Dnipro [in Ukrainian].

Konyskyi, O. (2014). Taras Shevchenko-Hrushivskyi. Khronika yoho zhyttia [Taras Shevchenko-Hrushivskyi. Chronicle of his life]. Kyiv: Klio [in Ukrainian].

Kostiuk, H. (2008). Zustrichi i proshchannia [Meetings and farewells]. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Smoloskyp [in Ukrainian].

Malaniuk, Y. (2024). Shevchenkoznavstvo i poetyka Shevchenka [Shevchenko studies and poetics of Shevchenko]. In Yevhen Malaniuk. Shevchenkiana. Zbirka eseiv. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].

Nenadkevych, Y. (1956). Tvorchist T. H. Shevchenka pislia zaslannia (1852–1858) [The work of T. G. Shevchenko after exile (1852–1858)]. Kyiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo khudozhnoi literatury [in Ukrainian].

Novychenko, L. (2016). Dolia [Fate]. In Shevchenkivska entsyklopediia. Literaturni tvory (pp. 128–131). Kyiv: Imeks-LTD [in Ukrainian].

Polishchuk, V. (2023). Muzy Tarasa Shevchenka. Intymno-liubovni dyskursy ukrainskoi literaturnoi shevchenkiany [Muses of Taras Shevchenko. Intimate-love discourses of Ukrainian literary Shevchenkiana]. Kyiv: Lira-K [in Ukrainian].

Petrov, V. (2013). Rozvidky [Investigations]. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].

Smal-Stotskyi, S. (2003). T. Shevchenko. Interpretatsii [T. Shevchenko. Interpretations]. Cherkasy: Brama [in Ukrainian].

Stebelskyi, B. (1991). Kontseptsiia slavy u tvorchosti Shevchenka [The concept of glory in Shevchenko’s work]. In Idei i tvorchist (pp. 183–193). Toronto [in Ukrainian].

Chyksentmihai, M. (2017). Potik. Psykholohiia optymalnoho dosvidu [Flow. Psychology of optimal experience]. Kharkiv: KSD [in Ukrainian].

Shahynian, M. (1964). Taras Shevchenko. Moscow [in Ukrainian].

Shevchenkо, T. (2018). Shchodenni zapysky (Zhurnal) Tarasa Shevchenka [Daily notes (Journal) of Taras Shevchenko]. Cherkasy [in Ukrainian].

Downloads


Abstract views: 73

Published

30.06.2024

How to Cite

Klochek, H. (2024). “Flow effect” as an important factor of artistic energetization of Shevchenko’s poetic text (based on the analysis of the poem “Fate”). LITERARY PROCESS: Methodology, Names, Trends, (23), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2024.23.4

Issue

Section

Sientifical articles