UKRAINOCENTRISM OF EPISTOLERY OF UKRAINIAN INTELLECTUALS OF LATE 19 — ERLY 20 CENTURIES (SEMIOTIC ASPECT)
Keywords:
semiotics, sign system, sign, ukrainocentrism, epistolaryAbstract
The article analyses the vector of ukrainocentrism in the epistolary through the lens of semiotic aspect. It ascertains the main peculiarities of ukrainocetrism in writing epistolary of the late 19 — early 20 centuries, and it defines that correspondence becomes an open platform for discussion of the prime social and political issues, the ground for ethic and aesthetic discussions, the resource of unbiased literal and critical reflections.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Busel V.T (Ed.). (2002). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. Kyiv, VTF «Perun», 1140 s.
Eco U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; London, Macmillan, s. 7.
Saussure F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Course in General Linguistics (trans. Roy Harris). London, Duckworth, 123 s.
Peirce C. (1931). Principles of Philosophy. Ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Vol. 2, p. 227.
IR NBUV, F. III, Spr. 40613. 2 ark.
Hrinchenko B. (1902). Dramy i komedii. Chernihiv, 337 s.
Bahalii D. (1992). Avtobiohrafiia. Kyivska starovyna, 4, s. 83.
IR NBUV, F. III, Spr. 33182. 1 ark.
IR NBUV, F. III, Spr. 40904. 1 ark.
IR NBUV, F. III, Spr. 40880. 1 ark.
IR NBUV, F. III, Spr. 40997. 1–4 ark.
Pavlychko S.D. (1999). Dyskurs modernizmu v ukrayinskii literaturi: monohrafiya. Kyiv, Lybid, 447 s.
