UKRAINIAN COMPARATIVE STUDY DURING 1920-1930s: REPRESESSIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS
Keywords:
literary studies, comparative studies, comparative-historical school, philological school, method, influence, tradition, sociologyAbstract
The article analyses peculiarities of the functioning of the comparative-historical direction in the Ukrainian literary criticism of the 1920–1930s, its achievements and losses. It is emphasized that the scientific resources of Ukrainian literary studies at post-revolutionary times were very powerful, relied on a solid world and European scientific traditions. According to the works by L. Biletskyi, K. Koperzhinskyi,
P. Fylypovych, the comparative-historical school was one of the main achievements of Ukrainian literary studies in the post-revolutionary decade. The changes since 1927 have been demonstrated: the only basic synthesis principle and method of literary criticism is the sociological or Marxist method. The works of literary critics, performances by critics, which testify to the gradual collapse of comparative studies
in Ukraine, and changes in its character up to the proclamation of bourgeois pseudoscience, are analysed. The negative influence of the ideological factor that caused irreparable harm to literary criticism in general and comparative studies in particular is investigated, which greatly destroyed the continuity of national
historical and literary thinking and narrowed the methodology of knowledge of literary phenomena.
Downloads
References
Aizenshtok I. (1928). Kotliarevshchyna. In I. Aizenshtok (Eds.). Ukrainski Propilei. T. I: Kotliarevshchyna,
DVU, ss. 9–121.
Aizenshtok I. (1925). Literaturnaia entsyklopediia. Slovar literaturnykh terminov v dvukh tomakh.
Entsyklopediia istorii nimetskoi literatury. Chervonyi shliakh, 11–12, S. 365–367.
Aleksandrova H.A. (2016). Pavlo Fylypovych: «porivnialni studii … poshyriuiut nash obrii»
(do 125-richchia vchenoho). Slovo i chas (9), S. 4–16.
Biletskyi L.T. (1999). Osnovy ukrainskoi literaturno-naukovoi krytyky. K., Lybid, 405 s.
V Instytuti T. Shevchenka. Robota kabinetiv. (1930). Literaturnyi arkhiv. (Kn. III–VI), s. 371–377.
Hordynskyi Ya. (1938). Literaturna krytyka pidsovietskoi Ukrainy. Lviv, 125 s.
Hrechaniuk S. (1991). Shchob davnie slovo na chatakh stalo. K., Dnipro. Literaturno-krytychni statti,
ss. 3–16.
Hrytsyk L. (2013). Ukrainske porivnialne literaturoznavstvo 1920-kh rokiv: mizh reliktamy
pozytyvistskykh uiavlen i typolohiieiu. Slovo i chas (8), ss. 12–22.
Doroshkevych O. (1930). Suchasnyi stan shevchenkoznavstva. Kh.–K., DVU. Etiudy z shevchenkoznavstva,
ss. 5–53.
Kyryliuk Ye. (1930). Literaturoznavcha robota v Kyievi. Literaturnyi arkhiv, Kn. I–II, s. 335.
Koperzhynskyi K.P. (1929). Fylypovych. Z novitnioho ukrainskoho pysmenstva. Vydavnytstvo
«Kultura», «Kyiv-Druk». Istorychno-literaturni statti, S. 148–150.
Koperzhynskyi K. (1929). Ukrainske naukove literaturoznavstvo za ostannie desiatylittia, 1917–1927
(vidbytka z «Studii z istorii Ukrainy», n.-d. kafedry istor. Ukrainy v Kyievi, t. II). K., 34 s.
Kostiuk H. (1971). Poet-uchenyi. Deshcho pro poetychnu i naukovu spadshchynu Pavla Fylypovycha.
Niu-York, SShA; Melborn, Avstraliia. Literatura ss. 551–563.
Kostiuk H. (1962). Ukrainske naukove literaturoznavstvo v pershe povoienne piatnadtsiatylittia.
ZNTSh. Zbirnyk na poshanu ukrainskykh uchenykh, znyshchenykh bolshevytskoiu Moskvoiu, ss. 185–216.
Kravtsiv B. (1962). Rozghrom ukrainskoho literaturoznavstva 1917–1937 rr. ZNTSh. Zbirnyk
na poshanu ukrainskykh uchenykh, znyshchenykh bolshevytskoiu Moskvoiu, ss. 217–242.
Navrotskyi B. (1928). «Haidamaky» Shevchenka. Dzherela. Styl. Kompozytsiia. B. m. DVU, 339 s.
Perets V.N. (1934). K voprosu o sravnitelnom metode v literaturovedenii. Trudy otdela drevnerusskoi
lyteratury Instituta russkoi literatury, ss. 327–339.
Perlin Ye. (1934). Hohol pro mystetstvo. ZhiR. (Kn. 4), ss. 102–118.
Petrenko P. (1931). U khashchakh formalizmu. Literaturnyi arkhiv (Kn. I–II), ss. 68–79.
Pylypchuk D. (1929). Prof. P. Fylypovych. «Z novitnoho ukrainskoho pysmenstva». Kultura. K.,
Literaturna hazeta, № 4 (70), S. 4.
Rosovetskyi S.K. (2003). Yakoho onovlennia potrebuie ukrainska komparatyvistyka : notatky
tradytsionalista. Slovo i chas (5), ss. 19–30.
Traven O. (1929). Prof. P. Fylypovych. Z novitnioho ukrainskoho pysmenstva. Istorychno-literaturni
statti. V-vo «Kultura» Derzhtrestu «Kyiv-Druk». Krytyka, № 7–8, S. 200–203.
Fylypovych P. (1929). Peredmova. In P. Fylypovych (Eds.). K., Kultura. Z novitnoho ukrainskoho
pysmenstva: istorychno-literaturni statti, ss. 3–6. K.: Kultura.
Fylypovych P. P. (1991). Sotsialne oblychchia ukrainskoho chytacha 30–40 rr. ХХ st. In P. P. Fylypovych
(Eds.). K., Dnipro. Literaturno-krytychni statti, ss. 17–31.
Fylypovych P. (1928). Ukrainske literaturoznavstvo za 10 rokiv revoliutsii. Literatura: zb. 1, ss. 5–28.
Chyzhevskyi D. (1994). Ternopil, Femina. Istoriia ukrainskoi literatury (vid pochatkiv do doby realizmu),
s.
Shchupak S. (1931). Formalizm na sluzhbi v ukrainskykh burzhuaznykh ta dribnoburzhuaznykh
eklektykiv. Krytyka, 10, ss. 31–49.
Yakubovskyi F. (1929). «Nebezpeka formalizmu». Krytyka, 9, ss. 8–28.
Yakubovskyi F. (1927). Na uzbichnykh stezhkakh poeta. K., Siaivo. In Shevchenko T. (Eds.). Povna
zbirka tvoriv: povisti, ss. 5–18.
Yakubskyi B. (1927). Do vzaiemyn marksivskoi metody z starymy metodamy literaturoznavstva. ZhiR,
, ss. 54–65.
