SOME FORMS OF RECEPTION OF CICERO IN THE TEXTBOOK ON ELOQUENCE “THE MOHYLA SPEAKER” (1636)

Автор(и)

  • Olga Zyganok
  • Valentyna Halagan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.146

Ключові слова:

rhetoric, Josip Kononovich-Gorbatsky, 17th century, Kyiv-Mohyla Academy

Анотація

The article analyses some forms of Mark Tullius Cicero’s reception in the earliest textbook on the rhetoric of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy — “Orator Mohileanus” (1636) by Joseph Kononovich-Gorbatsky.
The author of the national course in various ways indicates that he builds his course on the teachings of the father of eloquence, which he considers «Ours». Cicero for the Kyiv teacher is an absolute authority, not only as an orator and teacher of eloquence, but also as a politician and personality. However, we come across both the protection of the Roman speaker against possible opponents, and the elements of discussion with the Roman master. Joseph Kononovich-Gorbatsky considers the treatise “Of the Classification of Rhetoric” as a very good example of the short rhetorical teaching to beginners, in his case, to the students whom he calls Cicero candidates. The Roman coryphaeus is often paired with other authors in the Ukrainian textbook, most often with Quintilian. The textbook “Orator Mohileanus” is rich in definition, demonstrating a great variety in form. Cicero’s terminology is widely used in the Ukrainian manual, although it is not fully elaborated but sometimes controversial. Josip Kononovich-Gorbatsky uses different ways of commenting: explaining the term of Cicero, explaining his thoughts, etc. Sometimes the Ukrainian author is not sure that he well understood the Cicero’s idea. There are many examples of Cicero in Ukrainian rhetoric. The quotations are made in several forms: quotation of several fragments of Cicero’s works, a fragment or just the beginning.

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Біографії авторів

Olga Zyganok

Dr of Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Philology and Translation, Kyiv National University of Trade and EconomicsKyiv, Ukraine

ORCID iD 0000-0002-0009-6562

Valentyna Halagan

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Foreign Philology and Translation,Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics Kyiv, Ukraine

 

ORCID iD 0000-0003-4527-3363

DOI: 10.28925/2412-2475.2019.146

Посилання

Kononovych-Ghorbackyi, Y. (1972). Orator Mohylianskyi, per. z lat.

Rohovycha, M. D., Filosofsjka dumka, № 3, pp. 86–89 (in Ukrainian).

Kononovych-Horbatskyi, Y. (2014). Orator Mohylianskyi, per. z lat.

Vitaliia Masliuka, K.: Mediievist , 152 p. (in Ukrainian).

Stratii, Ya. M., Lytvynov, V. D., Andrushko, V. A. (1982). Opisaniie kursov filosofii i ritoriki professorov Kiievo-Mogilianskoi akademii, К.: Naukova dumka, 348 p. (in Ukrainian).

Axer, J. Central-Eastern Europe (2007). C. W. Kallendorf (ed.), A Companion to the Classical Tradition, Oxford.

Cicero. De partitione oratoria.

https:// www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus _tullius_cicero-de_partitione_oratoria/1942/pb_LCL349.307.xml

Ciceronis, M. T. De Partitionibus Oratoriis Dialogus, comment. Jacques-Louis d’Estrebay. Paris : Michel de Vascosan, 1543.

Cox, Virginia and O.Ward, John (ed.), (2006). The Rhetoric of Cicero in Its Medieval and Early Renaissance Commentary Tradition, Leiden, Boston.

Keeline, Thomas J. (2018). The Reception of Cicero in the Early Roman Empire: The Rhetorical Schoolroom and the Creation of a Cultural Legend.

Orator Mohileanus Marci Tullii Ciceronis apparatissimis Partitionibus excultus ... subreverendissimo patre Josapho Kononovio rhetorices professore anno 1636 mensis Aprilis die 27 // Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Institute of manuscript. Call number 30, 109, F. 1–303.

Downloads


Переглядів анотації: 214

Опубліковано

30.12.2019

Як цитувати

Zyganok, O., & Halagan, V. (2019). SOME FORMS OF RECEPTION OF CICERO IN THE TEXTBOOK ON ELOQUENCE “THE MOHYLA SPEAKER” (1636). Літературний процес: методологія, імена, тенденції, (14). https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.146

Номер

Розділ

Концептуальні питання літературознавства